By TV9 Karnataka and NEWS9 director Mahendra Mishra.
Welcome to the new era of TV news journalism in South India as our netas don a new role of 'Editors-in-Chief' of their own news channels!

Though all the channels of these netas have a designated professional 'editor', it is anybody's guess as to who calls the shots in selecting and playing the news items. There really are too many such characters to talk about! And they are mushrooming like Congress grass everywhere.

If the news media is the fourth pillar of democracy, then there is no doubting the fact that in the four southern states, if not nationally across most of the regional television space, this pillar has gone into the hands of politicians or their proxies.

There are two issues here; One, how are these channels going to sustain themselves financially as they generally have very low viewership and hence command extremely low advertising rates?

Secondly, even if they manage to last long, are they not going to cause a serious dent to the credibility of all news channels? Doesn't this dent the sanctity of news business? Doesn't it lead to serious credibility crisis among common viewers? Maybe 2011 will provide some answers.

When we look at South India's television news business in 2010, the most important word that creeps in our minds is 'politicisation of content and cable'.

Cable and content are inseparable in the TV news business. And this is something that netas in South India understand better than the most astute of businessmen today. Politicos' control content and cable both. Some of them own the news channels as well as the cable networks.

While 'paid news' and 'TRPised news content' on TV news channels continue to be the major areas of debate for the entire news industry in general, 2010 in South India will be remembered as a year when netas tightened their grips on news content and cable networks.

Andhra Pradesh

Take a look at the numbers - there are currently 14 TV news channels in Andhra Pradesh. Except for two or three channels, all the rest are directly or indirectly controlled by politicians or their proxies. It's an open secret that most of them have officially become the tools of political agendas. One wonders why should they be called news channels at all?

For example, when the TDP supremo went on a 'fast' (hunger strike) demanding better compensation for Andhra farmers, four news channels supported by TDP or its party cadre- ABN Andhra Jyothi, ETV2, Studio N and Maha TV beamed every bit of 'the action' live till the end, while at the same time, the Jagan Mohan Reddy-supported channels like Sakshi TV, NTV and TV5 made sure there was simply no coverage of the TDP Supremo's fast. And when Jagan Mohan Reddy went on fast on the same issue in Vijaywada, all the TDP-backed channels conveniently ignored him while Sakshi, NTV and TV5 telecast every moment 'live'.

2010 saw the launch of another news channel, Raj TV in Andhra Pradesh by TRS leader K Chandrasekhar Rao. The channel has a very simple agenda: propagate the cause of a separate Telangana state and criticise all those who are opposed to it. The channel makes sure there are enough OBs in Rao's rallies, but when someone else holds a political rally in Telanaga, Raj TV coverage of the event is conspicuous by its absence.

These issues raise serious concerns as to how 'objectivity and fairness,' which are so critical to credible news, are becoming the biggest casualties of the politician-sponsored news media.

Click here to read the full article.